Am 20.05.2011 09:46, schrieb Thomas de Groot:

> The contained_by in
> isosurfaces is also an object modifier, strictly speaking.

No, not really. Not according to how OBJECT_MODIFIERS is defined 
syntactically.

> I think that in this case, there should be a little sentence in the docs
> just stressing that all isosurface parameters have to be placed *before*
> any object modifier.

Note the same goes for /any/ object type: Object-type specific keywords 
must go first, before any generic object modifiers. So do we need such a 
sentence in the description of /all/ the primitives?

Post a reply to this message